|
Official NorVergence Class Action Hearing Reaction Statement
“A hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction was held on November 1, 2004 at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (Trenton Division). An Amicus Curiae Brief was filed in the Class Action on behalf of the Attorney General of the State of New Jersey and the Director of the New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. The Honorable Stanley R. Chesler denied Plaintiffs' motion, holding, in part, that there was not a showing at this time, under federal law, that there will be irreparable harm to the putative class if individual class members must defend, in foreign jurisdictions, individual lawsuits filed by the leasing companies. This was not a decision on the merits of the case, and counsel for the class hopes to proceed with a motion for class certification as soon as possible.” MICHAEL SCOTT GREEN, ESQ. Law Offices of Michael Scott Green Here is a copy of a memo sent by Mr. Green to “Class Members:” “RE: Norvergence Class Action, Preliminary Injunction Hearing “District Court for the District of New Jersey (Trenton) “Dear Class Members: “A hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction was held “The Honorable Stanley R. Chesler denied Plaintiffs' motion, holding, “Please keep in mind that yesterday's motion for a preliminary “There were in fact, as has been noted by an attending class member, a very large number of defendant attorneys present, nothing unexpected, and certainly something that as plaintiffs' attorneys we are used to. However, if the law is with you, the numbers don't matter. It is the law that levels the playing field. “And, as to the merits of this case, it our firm belief, that the law Michael S. Green, Esq. Law Offices of Michael Scott Green |
|
