|
|
CCL and “Class Action” This is making the internet rounds and is therefore in “public domain.” “Dear Class Members: “Our revised motion schedule is as follows: “March 31st – Deposition of Michael Ambrosio, Professor of Law, Seton Hall University Law School, “Expert for the Plaintiffs. “April 15th – Motion Objecting to the CIT Notices of Settlement and Releases “May 10th – Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Seeking to Void Ab Initio the Equipment Rental “Agreements “Motion for Class Certification “In addition, attached please find a SMOKING GUN, a discovery document from CCL which clearly states that CCL was a “partner” of Norvergence. In fact, the document goes on to state that Norvergence will supply CCL $400,000 of leases a month for the first year of the agreement, and CCL will educate the Norvergence sales force on the benefits of leasing. It is clear from this document that there was a “close-connectedness” between Norvergence and the leasing companies, it was not an arm's length relationship and that they were not holders in due course. “I have requested that the over 40 law firms around the country that are part of the attorney network defending individual actions around the country request similar documents from all of the leasing companies they are in suit with. “In approximately two weeks, Class Counsel will have very important announcements regarding the strategy of the future litigation of the Class Action. We are near reaching critical mass on the merits of some of these issues, despite the fact that the leasing companies have yet to produce any documents that have been requested of them. They are still trying to stonewall, hoping to get out before we get to all the facts. The CCL document is certainly tantalizing evidence of what else may be out there. “The next 6 weeks will likely be critical to our success. “We will keep you apprised, as always. Michael S. Green Attorney for Plaintiffs Norvergence Class Action MICHAEL SCOTT GREEN, ESQ. On the web@: www.lawmsg.com www.medmal-advisor.com Leasing News had obtained this document earlier than included in the Michael Green letter:
|
|
