|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Headlines--- Classified Ads-- Sr. Credit Officer/Sr. Management Leasing Industry "Help Wanted" Please Write Cook County Commissioners Readers Respond to "Leasing Company Name With Held" Ken Greene-An Attorney's Perspective-"Advance Payments" "Ethical Decisions as Value Maximizing Behavior" by Calvin M. Boardman, PhD CENTRIX Financial/Portfolio Financial Servicing First Business Fin. Elects Jan Eddy to Board Washington State UAEL Region Holiday Mixer Dec.30 This Border ##### Denotes Press Release (Not Written By Leasing News) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Classified Ads-- Senior Credit Officer/Senior Management Senior Credit Officer experienced in middle- market leasing; structured, vendor and 3rd party to the fortune 1000. Proactive team builder, originations capable with strong work ethic. Email: kyletrust@hotmail.com Senior Management: Baltimore, MD 25 year veteran of commercial and equipment leasing seeking a senior management position with leasing or asset based financing company in the southeast (Florida preferred) Email: kellogg_md@yahoo.com
Senior Management: Denver, CO. Fortune 500 GM/SVP wants to team up with aggressive lender looking for Western expansion mid-market equip. finance/leasing. 20+ years experience within Rocky Mountain/ Southwest and Ca markets. Email: legal@csotn.com Senior Management: Irvine, CA. Credit executive, portfolio manager and syndication facilitator. Extensive business building experience in small and mid-ticket operations. Highly innovative. Fortune 100 audit and technology skills. Bottom-line manager. Email: lenhubbard@bigfoot.com Senior Management: Long Island, NY Degree Banking/Finance. 13 years leasing exp. Now prez young leasing company where promises were not met. Interested in joining established firm with future. Email:bob33483@yahoo.com
Senior Management: Portfolio Management Consultant; 25+years experience in Collections, Customer Satisfaction, Asset Management, Recoveries, Continuous Process Improvement, Back end Revenue Generation, Cost per Collection Analysis. $5+Billion Portfolio expertise. Email: efgefg@rogers.com Senior Management: San Francisco, CA., 25 years experience w/global leasing company, sales,marketing,business dev., P&L responsibility, asset mgmt, brokering and re- marketing. Interested in joining an est. firm with a future. Email:rcsteyer@yahoo.com Senior Management: Tampa FL.20+ years of small to middle ticket finance, operations and sales management experience. Outstanding record of revenue enhancement, operational improvement and team development. Email: rlindcpa@earthlink.net full list of those seeking employment at: http://64.125.68.90/LeasingNews/JobPostings.htm
___________________________________________________________________ Leasing Industry “Help Wanted”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Where is Larry Brittingham? A few years ago he used to be with JDR and prior to that Advanta. A reader is trying to reach him.
Please Write Cook County Commissioners
ELT News
Industry members nationwide are urged to write the Cook County Commissioners in Illinois to explain the harmful impact of a proposed 4% lease tax that would pyramid atop the Chicago Transaction Tax. MidAmerica Association of Equipment Lessors President Clyde Cady, president of Facility Capital Corporation in Chicago, stresses every contact with Commissioners is critical before the final vote expected on Tuesday, December 9.
A sample letter and profiles of Commissioners including mailing addresses click on “Cook County [Chicago] Lease Tax Letters and Testimony” at http://www.elaonline.com/GovtRelations/State/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Readers Respond to “Leasing Company Name With Held”
“I read the story on the above. I've been a broker in the leasing business for over 20 years and it is obvious that the Leasing Co. and ‘Mr Name Withheld’ are committing an immoral if not illegal act. Any legitimate broker or leasing company that takes a deposit and then refuses to return it , in my opinion is doing an illegal act and also has no moral stand. If there was some legitimate expenses involved, like credit reports or other reports paid for by the leasing co. or broker, then they should get reimbursed for this only and not keep the whole amount of the deposit.
“In my experience over the years, any finance co. , leasing co. or bank that tried to play games with the deposits I automatically excluded them from by list of financing sources.
“Let's put the facts forward, with names, and let them defend their untenable position.”
Sincerely, Art Olson, President, Machinery Leasing Co, Willard, OH
--
“Based on the facts I see, I do not think the money should be kept unless their was a specific agreement stating such that the money was earned once the transaction was approved.
“I do not think you can keep advance rents if you do not fund the transaction, even if someone deceives you. To me, you would need an agreement outlining the conditions that the money would be earned in the event the lease does not fund.
“On smaller transactions, an agreement like this is usually not plausible. I'd just consider it good luck that I had a chance to dodge a potential bullet if I was being deceived.”
Gary Trebels
---
“A question or two for you. Do you have two set of standards? One for a ‘Jeff Beier’ a relatively unknown in the industry and a second one for ‘Mr Popular’. And, if ‘Mr. Popular’ has the belief and conviction that he is ethical in his dealings, then why doesn't he want his name in print?
Steve Reid, CLP VP Marketing, Leasing Division Santa Barbara Bank & Trust 2230 W. Chapman Ave #200 Orange, Ca 92868 800-700-9858 714-938-0288 (fax) email: reidst@sbbt.com
--
“I really enjoy your newsletter and the information it provides for the industry. I am responding to your article about ‘Leasing Company’s Name Withheld’.
“My first thoughts are that if "Mr. Name with held" felt he had done everything right then there would be nothing to hide concerning this transaction. With as much fraud that goes on within this industry, your newsletter is one of the few ways we can at the least be informed about possible "problem" funders or brokers. “
Brian Griffin
Vice President-Sales Mantis Financial
--
“How could you not print the name of a legitimate complaint just because he is a friend of one of your cronies? When you do this you lose all credibility as a provider of "Accurate, fair and unbiased news for the equipment Leasing Industry". Furthermore, I would think your potential liability for publishing these complaints would go up significantly now that it can be shown that you are prone to favoritism in what you publish.
“Either publish the guy's name or stop publishing complaints all together.”
Jeff Wetter jwetter@flexlease.com
--
“I've always believed your newsletter was not ‘fair & accurate’ Mr. Menkin. I've read past newsletters where you praise specific brokers and individuals in the industry who have reputations as liars, con artists, and criminals. Apparently, these individuals/companies have "friends" on your advisory board and complaints are never posted against them. As a casual reader of your newsletter, I find it highly unprofessional of you not to print the names of the parties involved in the third complaint.
“Your claim that members of your advisory board ‘"do not want it printed with names as Mr. Leasing Company Name With Held is their friend’ is pathetic. If the complaint appears to be legitimate for the Leasing News Bulletin Board, names should be reported, period.
“You seem to have no problem reporting the complaints against Mr. Beier and Mr. Hartley since they have no friends on your "advisory board."
“Too bad for Beier and Hartley. Great to know that you are not biased.”
( anonymous)
(For the record, our advisory board members are listed on our website:
Bob
Baker,
Wildwood Financial, St. Louis, MO
(( This is what I said at the beginning of the article: “Several of the Leasing News Advisory Board members do not want it printed with names as "Mr. Leasing Company Name With Held" is their friend, several believe it should be printed with names as it is a ‘legitimate complaint,’ some don't want to get involved "at all, and others say it is the ‘editor's job’ to make these decisions. “
(As with all boards, you get a cross section. Please let me state for the record, it was perhaps two who were opposed; one said I was being “very sanctimonious:” The overwhelming majority wanted me to print it with names. It is true a few cautioned about issues, perhaps two said it was the editor’s decision and not the advisory board ( which it really is) and one said he did not want to give an opinion. It is a very good board, diverse, and with different points of view. I like it that way. We don’t have any “yes men or women” serving . They serve to speak their mind. editor)
---
“So without commenting on the merits of the situation, it occurs to me that if ‘Mr. Name Withheld’ had not been a friend of some of your Board members, his name would have been plastered all over this reported complaint, something you just did to Mr. Hartley and Mr. Beier in this issue, and to other mere mortals in the past under similar circumstances.
So, if you're going to play this game, at least play it fairly and either tell everyone who ‘Mr. Name Withheld’ is, or amend your policy to prohibit revealing ANY names when reporting disputes of this kind.
Regards, Ken Kenneth D. Goodman, CLP
(It was not against policy.
(It is not uncommon for us not to name the parties, as evidenced in our weekly bulletin board reports (which have turned out to be more monthly, but that is another point.)
Please go here to see previous reports where we do not use names or companies. http://www.leasingnews.org/Conscious-Top%20Stories/Weekly_Report.htm
(You will see we often "preview" bulletin board complaints without names. Our role is to resolve the complaints, meaning negotiate a settlement. It is the role of an ombudsman. Many newspapers have such a “feature, “often called “Action Line. We are happy to report we resolve up to 80% of those submitted. editor )
Kenneth C. Greene—An Attorney’s Perspective-“Advance Payments”
As I think we all know, this issue of retention of "advance payments" has been lurking about for quite a while. Years ago, I litigated a case in which the prospective lessee, prior to financing, had given the broker a first and last month's payment, together with a security deposit. The broker, after the lessee sought financing elsewhere, refused to return the money, based on its contention that the money was an earned and thus non-refundable "commitment fee", although there was scant documentation supporting that position. The case was not far from trial when it was settled at a settlement conference conducted by the judge who was scheduled to hear the case. It was very much a compromise settlement, which meant, in effect, that neither side was happy with the result. Interestingly, and perhaps the only reason the case settled at all, the judge was not altogether convinced of the merits of either side's legal arguments, as there was virtually no law on the subject, although he did express empathy for both party's "moral" position.
Since then, I have always advised clients that there is a meaningful distinction between advance payments and commitment fees and that if a broker/lessor truly wants a prospective lessee to confirm that an advance payment, regardless of its denomination, is non-refundable, in whole or in part, it should be in writing. The parties should sign a separate proposal letter (as any agreement on the subject contained in the lease itself, if the lease never takes effect, is unlikely to be binding). In certain instances, and particularly in certain states, the parties should agree that the money be segregated in an interest bearing account.
We had a lively debate on this subject at one UAEL conference. Whereas there was no consensus amongst the attorneys (is there ever?) as to the mechanics of such a proposal, it was and still is my position that you can spell out in a signed pre-lease proposal letter (1) that some or all of the advance fee is non-refundable (2) whether any refundable monies will be paid with interest (3) the circumstances under which the fee becomes non-refundable, as well as those events which require that the fees be returned, i.e. the broker/lessor's inability to obtain financing (4) whether the monies will be placed in a segregated "escrow" account and (5) any other relevant issues. This can be a laborious process and may not always be conducive to the use of boilerplate forms, though a broker/lessor can adopt the usage of several different types of letters depending upon the nature of the transaction, and/or modify them as needed.
I know that, particularly in the small ticket leasing world, the broker/lessor is always reluctant to add more documentation, when the trend over the past ten years or more has been to minimize and simplify the paper process. Whether to adopt this suggested practice in this competitive market is no doubt a business decision each company must make. In doing so, however, a leasing company should at a minimum be well aware of the risks of not documenting the agreement regarding advance fees, as invariably the parties will later insist there was no agreement, take contrary positions, with all the problems ensuing from this type of disagreement. There are many more than I can outline here.
Today, with the leasing industry the focus of legislative, judicial, and media scrutiny more than ever, it is an unfortunate corollary that those engaged in leasing are better served if they avoid the temptation to put everything in a single document. It is my advice that they act to protect their interests, even if it means an extra step in the application process. These little headaches can help to prevent much larger ones down the road.
Ken Greene
Kenneth C. Greene Law Offices of Kenneth C. Greene 980 Magnolia Avenue Suite 6C Larkspur, CA 94939 Vox: 415 461 3777 Fax: 415 461 3733 E-Mail: keng@kengreenelaw.com Website: www.kengreenelaw.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Ethical Decisions as Value Maximizing Behavior” By Calvin M.Boardman, PhD
Journal of Equipment Lease Financing Fall 2003 Vol. 21/No. 2 (signature publication of the Equipment Leasing and Finance Foundation.
(The Foundation, provides its publications and resources free to those studying and researching in the equipment lease financing industry and to industry professionals.)
“Moral standards supersede an individual’s self-interest.The community can decide that a person should not lie or cheat even though it may be in that person’s self-interest to do so.”
http://two.leasingnews.org/loose_files/Ethical%20Decisions%20
Some excerpts:
“For example, if you hear any of the following phrases, examine the situation carefully for possible lapses in ethical judgment: 1. Everybody else does it. 2. If we don’t do it, someone else will. 3. That’s the way it has always been done. 4. We’ll wait until the lawyers tell us it’s wrong. 5. It doesn’t really hurt anyone. 6. The system is unfair. 7. I was just following orders.
“To the extent an industry promotes and polices itself to the point where ethical decision-making is the norm, the entire industry will benefit.
“5. Was there evidence of a dispute resolution process when allegations of unethical behavior were levied against members? Result: Only the ELA and UAEL websites provided information about their dispute resolution review process.
“6. Was there a clear process for the association to prosecute that behavior by referrals to criminal prosecutors or expulsion from the association? Result: ELA, UAEL, NAELB, and EAEL all provided information about their procedures for the investigation of ethical violations and the potential ramifications of such procedures. The ELA and UAEL procedures appeared to be more complete than the others. The CLP and AGL&F websites had no such reference.
“7. How many steps did the visitor to an association’s website have to take to locate that association’s code of ethics or code of fair business practices? Result: Only UAEL, NAELB, and CLP provided reference to their code of ethics or standards of behavior on their home page. One had to search further on the other associations’ websites to locate their codes.
“IS A HAVING A CODE OF ETHICS IMPORTANT? There are a number of reasons for going through all the effort to have such a code “including demonstrating a concern for ethics by the organization, transmitting ethical values of the organization to its members, and impacting the ethical behavior of those members,” say Thomas Wotruba et al.9 But in spite of these compelling motivations, the evidence is mixed as to whether these codes make a difference in practice.”
This is a nine page article by Calvin M. Boardman, PhD, Professor of Finance at the David Eccles School of Business at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City written expressly for the Journal of Equipment Lease Financing.
Note: The Foundation, provides its publications and resources free to those studying and researching in the equipment lease financing industry and to industry professionals
AGL&F –Association of Government Leasing and Finance www.aglf.org/ CLP-Certified Leasing Professional Foundation www.clpfoundation.org/ ELA –Equipment Leasing Association www.elaonline.com EAEL-Eastern Association of Equipment Lessors www.eael.org NAELB—National Association of Equipment Brokers www.naelb UAEL-United Association of Equipment Leasing www.uael.org
http://two.leasingnews.org/loose_files/Ethical%20
______________________________________________
### Press Release #######################
CENTRIX Financial and Portfolio Financial Servicing Company Announce Partnership
CENTENNIAL, CO/Portland, OR, - - CENTRIX Financial, LLC, a financial management and services firm, announced today that Portfolio Financial Servicing Company ("PFSC") has been selected to become the Backup Servicer of Record for the CENTRIX Financial portfolio. As part of this agreement PFSC will provide complete backup contract administration functions and disaster recovery components for the financial firm. In addition, PFSC will collaborate with CENTRIX on special projects aimed to enhance the management of current and future portfolio growth. "This new agreement with PFSC further bolsters the quality and security of the product we provide to our clients," said Robert E. Sutton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CENTRIX Financial. "PFSC's comprehensive backup servicing program and systems and their expertise in managing the needs of large portfolios are a perfect fit with the demands of our business." "PFSC is pleased to partner with a progressive company such as CENTRIX Financial," commented Portfolio Financial Servicing Company's President and CEO, Jerry Hudspeth. "CENTRIX's innovative business model allows it to serve the interests of many different customer groups and provides the standard for its market segments."
About PFSC
PFSC is the largest independent commercial lease and loan-servicing company in the U.S. and is headquartered in Portland, Oregon. PFSC provides primary/master servicing, backup/successor servicing, and consulting for leasing, loan and special asset portfolios. It currently services over $5.0 billion in assets. More information can be found at www.pfsc.com.
About CENTRIX Financial, LLC
Founded in 1990, Denver-based CENTRIX Financial's unique Special Auto Finance programs have helped to put over 70,000 vehicles on the road in the last five years alone. In 1998, the Company's CEO, Robert E. Sutton introduced a new business model that was designed to address the shortcomings in traditional approaches to the special finance market. CENTRIX is leading the evolution of the auto finance industry. For financial institutions, the Company's programs have brought a previously unknown level of security and profitability to the $200 billion special auto finance lending industry, while helping auto dealers find new ways to reach out to a clientele that represents more than 25% of their potential market. Just as importantly, CENTRIX is providing an underserved consumer group the keys to new opportunities at competitive financing rates and with professional service. Today, CENTRIX provides services across the country through agreements with over 6600 dealerships, has over 550 employees and is managing a $1 billion loan portfolio.
|